World US Repositions Naval Forces, no Decisions yet on Syria

L

LequteMan

Guest
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel has told reporters on Friday that the Pentagon has positioned forces in the Mediterranean as an option for President Barack Obama on tackling the Syria crisis.

A defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the U.S. Navy would expand its presence in the Mediterranean to four destroyers from three.

He said the USS Mahan, a destroyer armed with cruise missiles, had finished its deployment and was due to head back to its home base in Norfolk, Virginia. But the commander of the U.S. Sixth Fleet has decided to keep the ship in the region.

The official stressed the Navy had received no orders to prepare for any military operations regarding Syria.

The U.S. president has been hesitant to intervene in Syria's 2 1/2-year-old civil war but a preliminary assessment that chemical weapons were used by Syrian forces in the attack near Damascus this week by American and European security sources could increase the pressure on Obama.

The assessment was preliminary and conclusive proofs are needed which could take days, weeks or longer to get.

Opponents of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad braved the front lines around Damascus to smuggle out tissue samples from victims of Wednesday's mass poisoning,

International powers - includingRussia, which has long shielded Assad from U.N. action - have urged Assad to cooperate with a U.N. inspection team that arrived on Sunday to pursue earlier allegations of chemical weapons attacks

The Syrian government denies being responsible and has in the past accused rebels of using chemical weapons, an allegation that Western officials have dismissed.

Members of Obama's National Security Council, the Pentagon, State Department and intelligence agencies met at the White House late on Thursday, but made no decisions on what to recommend, officials said.

. The White House on Friday reiterated Obama's position that he did not intend to put "boots on the ground" in Syria, and an administration official said Thursday's meeting also steered clear of the idea of enforcing a "no-fly" zone there.

The top Democrat on the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee urged Obama on Friday to order air strikes against Assad's government.

Representative Eliot Engel cited Obama's statement that the use of chemical weapons by Assad's forces would cross a "red line" and cause the United States to act to halt such violations of international law.

"If we, in concert with our allies, do not respond to Assad's murderous uses of weapons of mass destruction, malevolent countries and bad actors around the world will see a green light where one was never intended," Engel wrote in a letter to Obama and obtained by Reuters.

Obama's senior national security advisers are to discuss US options this weekend including possible military action against the Syrian government.

No final decisions were expected from the meeting pending a further review of the intelligence attack.

With Obama's international prestige seen on the line, a former senior U.S. official said the suspected chemical attack was likely to prompt Obama to use limited force, but he did not expect him to try to topple Assad.

Obama's failure to confront Assad with the serious consequences he has long threatened would likely reinforce a global perception of a president preoccupied with domestic matters and unwilling to act decisively in the volatile Middle East, a picture already set by his mixed response to the crisis in Egypt.

Polls have shown that most Americans, weary of wars in Iraq andAfghanistan, are increasingly aware of the Syria conflict but remain opposed to U.S. involvement there.
 
Back
Top