President-Bola-Tinubu (1).webp
The Nigerian Presidency has earmarked ₦10 billion to install solar power at the Aso Rock Villa, citing the burden of rising electricity costs. The move, which comes as many Nigerians struggle under the newly introduced Band A electricity tariff, has sparked widespread backlash and questions about equity, trust in public utilities, and government priorities.

Highlights​

  • ₦10bn set aside: The Presidency’s 2024 supplementary budget includes a ₦10bn allocation for solar infrastructure at the Villa, reportedly to reduce dependence on the national grid.
  • Power cost pressure: The justification comes amid complaints of rising bills under the new Band A tariff, which offers a more stable supply but at higher rates.
  • Citizens react: Nigerians online quickly responded with frustration, mockery, and concern.

    “So even the Villa can’t afford Band A fees?” -@abisuga
    “₦10bn for solar? Hope it powers transparency too.” — @AdetunjiAdewolu
    “Govt banned solar imports, but wants it for themselves.” — @Kwu_Vic
    “If the father runs from the family problem, what do the children do?” — @iamizuogu
    Click to expand...
  • Import irony: Critics noted that while solar panels remain heavily taxed or restricted for everyday citizens, the government appears to be making its switch.
In a country where millions still live in darkness or rely on petrol-guzzling generators, the Presidency’s move to solar might seem like a smart investment — but timing and optics matter. Rather than inspire confidence in energy reform, the ₦10bn budget is being seen as an escape route for those in power, further highlighting the disconnect between government actions and the public’s daily struggles. The symbolism is hard to ignore: if the nation's seat of power is going off-grid, what does that say about the grid itself?