In a heated fraud trial involving Peter Okoye of P-Square and former manager Jude Okoye, defence lawyer Clement Onwuenwunor accused Peter of lying about key facts to mislead investigators. Cross-examination revealed contradictions in Peter’s education, access to royalties, and bank signatory rights.
- Peter Okoye earlier told the EFCC he was a graduate of the University of Abuja, but his defence proved he dropped out.
- Defence presented bank documents showing Peter and Paul Okoye had access to Northside accounts.
- Contrary to Peter’s claims, he made large withdrawals and received direct transfers.
- Peter claimed ignorance of a royalties deal; the defence showed he signed and received smaller amounts than he testified.
- Justice Rahman Oshodi admitted several documents into evidence and adjourned the case to October 2025.
The defence’s strategy focused on dismantling Peter Okoye’s credibility by contrasting his EFCC statement with court testimony. If proven intentional, the alleged fabrications could weaken the prosecution’s narrative and reshape public perception of the rift between the Okoye brothers. The case also raises questions about transparency in artist–management agreements in Nigeria’s music industry.
As the trial resumes in October, more revelations are expected. The public will be watching closely, not just for legal outcomes, but for insight into the long-standing P-Square fallout.
