The Digest:
Human rights lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) has criticized the Nigerian military for its handling of an alleged coup plot, stating it should have apologized for initially misleading the public. Falana reacted to the military's Monday statement confirming officers would face trial for plotting to overthrow the government, a reversal of its October 2025 denial, which dismissed such reports as "false and malicious." Falana argued that authorities must take the public seriously and that a public apology was necessary after such a significant U-turn. He also insisted the accused cannot be tried by court-martial for treason, which must be heard in a civilian High Court.
Key Points:
- The critique highlights a perceived lack of transparency and accountability in official communications regarding grave national security matters.
- It underscores the importance of institutional credibility, arguing that retracting serious denials without apology erodes public trust.
- Falana frames the issue as a matter of fundamental rights, emphasizing the detained officers' entitlement to legal counsel and proper judicial process.
- The statement raises legal questions about the appropriate forum for trying alleged treason, challenging the military's jurisdiction.
- It reflects broader concerns about due process and the rule of law in handling sensitive cases involving military personnel.
SOURCES: Channels Television, TVC
