Sule Lamido has condemned Seyi Tinubu’s Ramadan food distribution across northern Nigeria, calling it a “humiliation” and criticizing its political overtones. The initiative, aimed at providing aid, sparked debate on social media, with many questioning the motives behind the charity event.
Sule Lamido, former governor of Jigawa State, has sparked a heated debate by fiercely criticizing Seyi Tinubu’s Ramadan food distribution campaign in northern Nigeria. The initiative, which saw Seyi Tinubu, the son of President Bola Tinubu, distribute food packages across several northern states, has drawn sharp condemnation from Lamido, who described the event as a “humiliation” to the region.
In a viral video, Lamido questioned the motives behind the food distribution, which included packaged meals like Danwake, presented in plastic bags adorned with Seyi Tinubu’s and his father’s images. The former governor argued that such initiatives, while intended to provide aid, instead serve to degrade the people of the north. He emphasized that the northern region, historically home to great leaders like Aminu Kano, Sir Ahmadu Bello, and Tafawa Balewa, should not be reduced to receiving handouts of cooked rice.
“You claim Arewa is known for its bravery and integrity, but here we have Seyi Tinubu in Sokoto and Kano, distributing rice. Is this what governance has become? This is a complete humiliation,” Lamido stated, visibly frustrated by the gesture.
Lamido’s criticism centers on what he perceives as a political strategy disguised as charity. He argued that food distribution is more about gaining political mileage than addressing the real needs of the people. He urged the people of the north to reject such actions, asserting, “If we stay on the right path, no one can defeat us.” Lamido’s remarks have quickly gained traction on social media, where many shared similar sentiments, questioning the sincerity of such acts during the holy month of Ramadan.
Social media reactions have been mixed, with some mocking the distribution, and highlighting the small portions of rice being handed out. One commenter joked, “Next round will probably be a swallow,” referencing the type of food likely to be distributed next. Others criticized the move as an example of political exploitation, especially given the context of the Ramadan fast, a time typically reserved for self-reflection and charity.
Despite the backlash, some defended the initiative, calling it a well-meaning effort to alleviate hunger. “It’s charity, and he’s doing well,” one supporter remarked.
As the controversy unfolds, it remains clear that the distribution of food, though aimed at helping those in need, has become a focal point for political discussions about governance, dignity, and the motives behind such charity efforts amid an election year.
