Nigerian singer Harrysong has criticized pastors opposing payment for gospel artists, arguing that churches compensate pastors but hesitate to pay musicians. His comments follow a debate sparked by clergyman Femi Lazarus and singer Timi Dakolo. The controversy has divided opinions, with many questioning fairness in church compensation practices.
Nigerian singer Harrysong has criticized pastors who oppose paying gospel artists for their performances in churches. His comments come in response to a heated debate sparked by clergyman Femi Lazarus, who suggested that gospel musicians should not charge churches for their services. This stance drew backlash from singer Timi Dakolo, who argued that musicians, like pastors, deserve fair compensation.
Taking to his Instagram stories, Harrysong questioned the double standards, pointing out that churches pay and take care of their pastors but hesitate when it comes to gospel artists. He argued that gospel musicians invest time, effort, and resources into their craft, just like other professionals, and should be paid for their services.
The discussion has generated mixed reactions, with some supporting Harrysong’s stance and others defending the clergy’s position. Critics of paid performances in churches argue that gospel music should be a ministry rather than a business. However, supporters, including other artists, maintain that musicians have financial obligations and should be compensated for their work, just like pastors and church staff.
4o
