HURIWA criticizes retiring Chief Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, calling his tenure the “worst ever.” Allegations of nepotism, including the appointment of his brother and son to judicial positions, have tarnished the judiciary's integrity. Public reactions reflect a mix of support and skepticism regarding these claims.
The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) has sharply criticized the retiring Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Hon. Justice Olukayode Ariwoola, labeling his tenure as “very disappointing” and the “worst CJN ever.” As Justice Ariwoola concludes his time in office, having reached the mandatory retirement age, HURIWA's condemnation focuses on allegations of nepotism and corruption.
HURIWA contends that Justice Ariwoola's leadership has severely damaged the credibility of the judiciary, citing the appointment of his brother, Adebayo Lateef Ariwoola, to a significant position within the National Judicial Council (NJC) as a prime example of nepotism. The organization argues that this appointment creates a clear conflict of interest, undermining the integrity of the NJC's financial operations.
Moreover, the group condemned Justice Ariwoola for reportedly facilitating a judicial appointment for his son, Olukayode Ariwoola Jr., as a Federal High Court Judge, igniting public outrage. This pattern, HURIWA claims, has fostered a culture of nepotism in judicial appointments, as seen with other judicial figures, including the Chief Judge of Abuja, who has similarly appointed family members.
Public reactions to HURIWA's statements have been mixed. While some users express strong support for the criticisms, others question the organization’s motives, labeling it a politically driven group. Comments range from frustration at the perceived corruption within the judiciary to outright dismissal of HURIWA’s claims. As the nation reflects on Justice Ariwoola's legacy, the discussion surrounding integrity in judicial appointments remains a pressing concern.
