A clash between the IGP and the Police Service Commission (PSC) over the retirement of senior officers has led to controversy, legal battles, and concerns over police morale. While the PSC insists on enforcing civil service rules, the IGP's counter-directive has sparked widespread criticism and legal action from affected officers.
The directive by the Police Service Commission (PSC) ordering officers who have completed 35 years in service or turned 60 years old to retire has sparked controversy after Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Kayode Egbetokun instructed affected officers to remain in service pending further directives.
The PSC’s decision, aligned with the Public Service Rules, aims to standardize retirement policies. However, the IGP’s counter-directive has drawn criticism from retired senior officers, including former Deputy Inspectors-General (DIGs) and Assistant Inspectors-General (AIGs), who insist that the commission’s order follows established civil service regulations.
Some officers impacted by the PSC's directive have taken legal action, challenging their compulsory retirement. Among them are senior police officers who argue that their removal contradicts existing laws, particularly regarding re-engagement provisions in the Police Act.
Retired police officials have voiced concerns over the implications of the IGP’s stance. A former AIG described the situation as “unfortunate,” warning that the back-and-forth could undermine morale within the force. Another retired DIG criticized what he called “political interference,” arguing that the IGP has no authority to overrule the PSC.
With lawsuits already filed and concerns over favoritism growing, the dispute highlights a deeper issue within Nigeria’s police structure. Analysts warn that ongoing uncertainty could weaken discipline and operational efficiency in the force. The situation remains unresolved as both parties stand firm on their positions.
