The Digest:
Legal experts have described IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu's refusal to enter a defence against terrorism charges as a "risky gamble" that could have serious implications for his trial. The defendant told the Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday that he would not defend himself, maintaining that no valid charges exist against him despite the court's earlier dismissal of his no-case submission.
Key Points:
- Nnamdi Kanu refuses to open defence in terrorism trial, citing "no valid charges."
- Lawyers warn that the decision is risky and could leave prosecution evidence unchallenged.
- Human rights lawyer Inibehe Effiong says the court must now rely on the prosecution's evidence.
- SAN Monday Ubani calls it "a wrong procedure in criminal trial."
- The court advised Kanu to consult criminal law experts before finalizing his stance.
- Judge James Omotosho directed Kanu to file a written address on his position.
- Case adjourned to November 4 for potential final addresses.
Sources: Premium Times
