peter-obi-1 (1) (1) (1).jpg
Peter Obi has slammed the National Assembly for using a voice vote to approve Tinubu’s state of emergency in Rivers State. He called the process illegal and a threat to democracy. His statement has sparked mixed reactions, with legal experts questioning the vote’s constitutionality.

Former Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi has condemned the National Assembly’s decision to approve President Bola Tinubu’s emergency declaration in Rivers State through a voice vote. Obi described the move as unconstitutional and a threat to democratic principles.

In a statement shared on social media, Obi argued that such a significant decision should have been conducted through a proper voting process, ensuring transparency and accountability. He insisted that the Constitution mandates a recorded vote for matters requiring a two-thirds majority, warning that bypassing due process sets a dangerous precedent.

“The Constitution is clear on how such votes should be conducted. Using a voice vote for a decision of this magnitude undermines democracy and weakens public trust in governance,” Obi stated.

His remarks have sparked intense debate among Nigerians. Supporters echoed his concerns about democratic erosion, while critics dismissed his stance, arguing that a state of emergency was necessary to stabilize Rivers State.

Legal experts have also raised concerns over the legitimacy of the approval process, questioning whether the required majority was truly met. Political analysts suggest that the controversy could lead to further scrutiny of legislative procedures in the coming weeks.