A heated debate erupted in the House of Representatives over President Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State. Lawmakers clashed over the suspension of Governor Fubara and the appointment of an administrator. Critics question the legality of the move, sparking nationwide discussions on constitutional overreach.
A fierce debate erupted in the House of Representatives on Wednesday over President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State. The confrontation, which took place before the plenary, involved two female lawmakers, Blessing Amadi from Rivers and Marie Ebikake, who engaged in a heated exchange over the controversial decision.
As tensions flared, Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu called the house to order and presided over discussions on the emergency rule. The crisis stems from prolonged political instability in Rivers, prompting Tinubu to suspend Governor Siminalayi Fubara, Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu, and all House of Assembly members for six months. In their place, the president appointed retired Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas as interim administrator.
Citing Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, Tinubu justified the move as necessary to restore order. However, the decision has sparked intense debate among lawmakers and political observers. Supporters argue that federal intervention is needed to prevent further instability, while critics warn that suspending elected officials undermines democracy and sets a troubling precedent.
As discussions continue, concerns remain about the long-term impact of this decision on governance in Rivers State and beyond. Many citizens and political analysts are closely watching how the situation unfolds, with opinions sharply divided on whether the emergency rule is a necessary intervention or an overreach of executive power.
![[VIDEO] Kogi Central Constituents Start Recall Process for Senator Akpoti Uduaghan](/data/attachments/214/214597-38d2773411de4755ec5cab426216dfb3.jpg?hash=Dx8tr8Jq9U)
