VDM (1).jpg
VeryDarkMan (VDM) claims he did not defame rapper Falz despite making insinuations about his sexuality. VDM expresses disappointment that Falz didn't reach out to Bobrisky, the source of the allegations, instead of confronting him. Reactions on social media are mixed, with many questioning VDM's claims.

In the ongoing controversy surrounding VeryDarkMan (VDM) and rapper Falz, VDM has claimed he did not defame the artist despite making insinuations about his sexuality. Following a recent conversation, VDM expressed his disappointment that Falz did not approach Bobrisky, the source of the allegations, to clear his name. VDM stated, "I told Falz that I didn’t defame him and that I’ll see him in court. I expected Falz to send the letter to Bobrisky instead of coming after me." The issue stems from VDM’s comments about Falz’s sexual orientation, which many believe are defamatory.

Social media reactions have been mixed, with some users criticizing VDM for his claims. Comments range from disbelief at his expectations of Falz to discussions about the fragility of defamation laws in Nigeria.

Several users pointed out that insinuating someone is gay can be considered defamation, while others questioned VDM's understanding of legal proceedings. Some commenters expressed support for Falz, highlighting his reputation as an unproblematic artist and criticizing VDM’s approach. As the situation unfolds, many are curious about how the legal battle will play out, especially given Falz’s legal background and the serious implications of the accusations.