David_Hundeyin (1).jpg
David Hundeyin, Nigerian journalist, criticizes EndSARS protests, comparing them unfavorably to recent Kenyan demonstrations. He targets FEMCO for mismanagement and self-promotion. Reactions are mixed, with some agreeing and others defending the movement. The controversy reignites debates about protest strategies and activism in Nigeria.

Nigerian investigative journalist David Hundeyin has sparked controversy with his critical comments about the 2020 EndSARS protests. Hundeyin compared the EndSARS movement unfavorably to recent protests in Kenya, which he claims have been more effective in achieving concrete results.

Hundeyin described the EndSARS protests as an "extravaganza," criticizing plans for entertainment like Premier League screenings and musical performances at protest sites. He particularly targeted the Feminist Coalition (FEMCO), accusing them of using the protests for self-promotion and mismanaging donated funds.

The journalist alleged that FEMCO inserted themselves into a cause unrelated to their core mission, became the face of the movement, and then abruptly withdrew at a crucial moment, telling protesters to leave the Lekki Toll Gate. Hundeyin contrasted this with the leaderless nature of the Kenyan protests, which he views as more effective.

Reactions to Hundeyin's comments have been mixed. Some social media users agree with his assessment, calling it a "solid point" and expressing shame at how the protests were conducted. Others defend the EndSARS movement, criticizing Hundeyin for disregarding the lives lost during the protests and questioning his authority to comment given his distance from the events.

Critics accuse Hundeyin of dishonesty and rehashing talking points that were used to justify the violent crackdown on protesters. Some respondents also question the validity of comparing the two protest movements, given their different contexts and goals.